Public Bill Committee

[Julie Elliott in the Chair]

Clause 160 - Extent

Question proposed, That the clause stand part of the Bill.

Julie Elliott: With this it will be convenient to consider clauses 161 and 162 stand part.

Thomas Tugendhat: It is nice to see you this afternoon, Ms Elliott. I look forward to proceeding in order for some parts of this afternoon sitting.
Clause 160 details the Bill’s territorial extent. In preparing the Bill, both Ministers and officials have engaged extensively with their counterparts in the devolved Administrations to ensure that we tackle economic crime and strengthen corporate transparency across all of the United Kingdom. The measures in the Bill extend to England and Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. Some of its provisions have a lesser extent, where they amend existing legislation that extends only to one or two different parts of the UK. In the opinion of the UK Government, the Bill makes some provision for areas within the devolved competence of Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. However, the Bill respects the devolution settlements and, where relevant, legislative consent motions are being sought from the devolved Administrations.
Clause 161 sets out procedural detail for the commencement of the Bill’s provisions. It stipulates the various dates when, and conditions under which, the various sections and subsections will come into force. The Secretary of State can make regulations that set the date for certain provisions to come into force. Different days may be appointed for different purposes. The Secretary of State can also make transitional or savings provisions for regulations made under certain clauses, as set out in the Bill. Any regulations made under the clause are to be made by statutory instrument.
Clause 162 establishes that the title of the Bill once it becomes an Act will be the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act. The short title is a standard clause in any Bill.

Seema Malhotra: It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Ms Elliott.
I have a few limited remarks to make as we approach the end of clause-by-clause consideration and before we move on to new clauses. As the Minister said, clause 160 extends the Bill to England and Wales, Scotland,  and Northern Ireland. I was grateful for his comments about liaison with the Scottish Parliament and the Welsh Senedd. There are obviously current challenges in respect of the Northern Ireland Executive. I would be grateful for some clarity about how the engagement with the devolved Administrations is going, because it has been a theme, certainly during the earlier debates. It is important that we can have confidence that all the issues that are being raised in our deliberations are coming into the Bill.
Clause 161 sets out when the Bill’s provisions will come into force. I am sure the Minister will want to give assurances that that will be no later than is absolutely necessary, bearing in mind the urgency of the measures. Clause 162 establishes the short title and we welcome it.

Thomas Tugendhat: Different devolved Administrations have been contacted in different ways. Some of them have been written to, and I have sought conversations with some, although that has not always been achieved because of other people’s diaries as well as my own. The conversation is ongoing and, although I hope the Bill will be passed soon, it will have to continue because many things are going to change over the coming years.

Question put and agreed to.

Clause 160 accordingly ordered to stand part of the Bill.

Clauses 161 and 162 ordered to stand part of the Bill.

New Clause 1 - Change of addresses of officers of overseas companies by registrar

“In section 1046 of
the Companies Act 2006 (overseas companies: registration of
particulars), after subsection (6)
insert—
‘(6A)
Where regulations under this section require an overseas company to
deliver to the registrar for
registration—
(a) a
service address for an officer of the company,
or
(b) the address of the
principal office of an officer of the
company,
the regulations may
make provision corresponding or similar to any provision made by
section 1097B or 1097C (rectification of register relating to service
addresses or principal office addresses) or to provision that may be
made by regulations made under that
section.’”.—(
Where an overseas company is required to provide a service address or principal office address for a director or secretary, this new clause enables regulations to be made conferring power on the registrar to change the address if it does not meet the statutory requirements or is inaccurate.

Brought up, and read the First time.

Kevin Hollinrake: I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Julie Elliott: With this it will be convenient to discuss the following:

Government new clause 2—Overseas companies: availability of material for public inspection etc.

Government new clause 3—Registered addresses of an overseas company.

Government new clause 4—Overseas companies: identity verification of directors.

Kevin Hollinrake: It is always a pleasure to serve with you in the Chair, Ms Elliott. Government new clauses 1 to 4 will introduce delegated powers allowing for the application of the Companies House reform measures elsewhere in the Bill to overseas companies registered in the UK. In this context, an overseas company is one that is incorporated overseas but that has a physical establishment or branch in the UK. Under long-standing provisions in the Companies Act 2006, that presence brings with it certain obligations to register information with Companies House.
New clauses 1 to 3 allow for the making of regulations requiring overseas companies that have established a physical presence in the UK to provide an appropriate address for the overseas company, their directors or other officers, to the same standard required of domestic companies incorporated here in the UK. The aim is the same—to ensure that addresses and email addresses on the companies register are accurate and that documents sent to them will reach the companies concerned or their officers.
New clause 4 allows the application, through regulations, of identity verification requirements to directors of overseas companies operating in the UK. Through that, the Government seek to ensure that companies governed by the laws of other jurisdictions that operate in the UK are subject to identity verification requirements that are introduced by the Bill and will apply to UK companies. Regulations under the power will include requiring the delivery of statements or other information to the registrar. They will also include exemptions from identity verification on national security grounds.
The application of identity verification obligations through secondary legislation will allow the Government to adapt ID verification requirements at speed. Overseas companies who operate within the UK are only within limited control of UK law. UK legislation affecting them therefore needs to adapt more quickly to their changing circumstances than primary legislation would allow for.

Seema Malhotra: It is a pleasure to speak to the new clauses. The Minister has outlined the rationale for them, which is to bring some of the rules around overseas companies more in line with some other changes being made in the Bill. We welcome that, but I have a few questions.
New clause 1 outlines that where an overseas company is required to provide a service address or principal office address for a director or secretary, regulations can be made conferring power on the registrar to change the address if it does not meet the statutory requirements or is inaccurate. Who might determine whether the address is inaccurate? Is the expectation that the registrar finds that out or is that just about if something happens to be found out by chance? Is there any more information on how the power might be used to determine that an address is inaccurate?
New clause 2 confers a regulation-making power to require overseas companies to register information. The new clause makes it clear that the regulations can provide for the information to be withheld from public inspection and can confer a discretion on the registrar. We have had similar debates in Committee already. We will keep coming back to the question of the use of powers and  the reporting on the use of those powers, particularly where information may be withheld. Would this be an example of a new power on the withholding of information from public inspection where the number of times it is used ought to be reported on? That would not need to give away details about whom the power had applied to, but it would help give an overall view of how the powers in the Bill were being used.
Under new clause 3, new regulations would require overseas companies to provide and maintain an appropriate address and email address. Would those new regulations be subject to the affirmative procedure, assuming that they would be in secondary legislation rather than in the Bill? It was not fully clear to me whether some of these matters were included in the Bill or whether they were regulations to enable the measures to come in later. Will the Minister clarify that?

Kevin Hollinrake: I am happy to, and I thank the hon. Lady for her points. As we have said during similar discussions, the registrar will have access to information; most of the queries that she will follow up will have come through information received during the course of her duties. It does not make sense for Companies House to physically validate all addresses, but nevertheless information may well come to light through the registrar’s work or the requirement for other bodies to share information with her if they feel that inaccurate information is on the register. That is how we anticipate that information will come forward.
I will not revisit the issue of national security other than to say that the power will be used sparingly and that we do not know what we do not know, so it is important that we have a provision that might be necessary in future.
Regulations under new clause 4 will correspond to regulations applying to UK companies made and debated by Parliament under the affirmative procedure. The extension to overseas companies would therefore not require additional scrutiny by Parliament and the regulations will be subject to the negative procedure.

Question put and agreed to.

New clause 1 accordingly read a Second time, and added to the Bill.

New Clause 2 - Overseas companies: availability of material for public inspection etc

“In section 1046 of the
Companies Act 2006 (overseas companies: registration of particulars),
after subsection (6A) (inserted by section (Change of addresses of
officers of overseas companies by registrar) of this Act)
insert—
‘(6B)
Regulations under this section may include provision for information
delivered to the registrar under the regulations to be withheld from
public inspection.
(6C) The
provision that may be made by regulations under this section includes
provision conferring a discretion on the
registrar.’”—
Section 1046 of the Companies Act 2006 confers a regulation-making power to require overseas companies to register information. The new clause makes it clear that the regulations can provide for the information to be withheld from public inspection and that they can confer a discretion on the registrar.

Brought up, read the First and Second time, and added to the Bill.

New Clause 3 - Registered addresses of an overseas company

“(1) The Companies
Act 2006 is amended as
follows.
(2) After section 1048
insert—
‘1048A
Registered addresses of an overseas
company
(1) The Secretary of
State may by regulations make provision requiring an overseas company
that is required to register particulars under section 1046 to deliver
to the registrar for
registration—
(a) a
statement specifying an address in the United Kingdom that is an
appropriate address for the
company;
(b) a statement
specifying an appropriate email address for the
company.
(2) The regulations
may include
provision—
(a) allowing
an overseas company to change the address or email address for the time
being registered for it under the
regulations;
(b) requiring an
overseas company to ensure that the address or email address for the
time being registered for it under the regulations is an appropriate
address or appropriate email
address.
(3) The regulations
may include—
(a)
provision for information contained in a statement specifying an
appropriate email address to be withheld from public
inspection;
(b) provision
corresponding or similar to any provision made by
section 1097A (rectification of register relating to a company’s
registered office) or to provision that may be made by regulations made
under that section.
(4) In this
section—
“appropriate address” has the meaning given by section 86(2);
“appropriate email address” has the meaning given by section 88A(2).
(5) Regulations under
this section are subject to negative resolution
procedure.’
(3) In
section 1139 (service of documents on company), for subsections (2) and
(3)
substitute—
‘(2)
A document may be served on an overseas company whose particulars are
registered under section
1046—
(a) by leaving it
at, or sending it by post to, the company’s registered address,
or
(b) by leaving it at, or
sending it by post to, the registered address of any person resident in
the United Kingdom who is authorised to accept service of documents on
the company’s
behalf.
(3) In subsection (2)
“registered
address”—
(a) in
relation to the overseas company, means the address for the time being
registered for the company under regulations under section
1048A(1)(a);
(b) in relation to
a person other than the overseas company, means any address for the
time being shown as a current address in relation to that person in the
part of the register available for public
inspection.’”—
Regulations under this new clause can require an overseas company to provide and maintain an appropriate address and appropriate email address. Broadly speaking, an address is appropriate if documents sent there will reach the company.

Brought up, read the First and Second time, and added to the Bill.

New Clause 4 - Overseas companies: identity verification of directors

“After section
1048A of the Companies Act 2006 (inserted by section (Registered
addresses of overseas companies) of this Act)
insert—
‘1048B
Identity verification of
directors
(1) This section
applies in relation to an overseas company that is required to register
particulars under section
1046.
(2) The Secretary of
State may by regulations make provision for the purpose of ensuring
that each individual who is a director of such a
company—
(a) is an
individual whose identity is verified (see section 1110A),
or
(b) falls within any
exemption from identity verification that may be provided for by the
regulations.
(3) The
regulations may include
provision—
(a) requiring
the delivery of statements or other information to the
registrar;
(b) for statements
or other information delivered to the registrar under the regulations
to be withheld from public
inspection;
(c) applying
section 167M (prohibition on director acting unless ID verified), with
or without modifications;
(d)
applying section 1110D (exemption from identity verification: national
security grounds), with or without
modifications.
(4) Regulations
under this section are subject to negative resolution
procedure.’”—
Regulations under this new clause can impose identity verification requirements on the directors of overseas companies, corresponding to the requirements introduced by the Bill for directors of UK companies.

Brought up, read the First and Second time, and added to the Bill.

New Clause 5 - Rectification of register: service addresses

“(1) The Companies
Act 2006 is amended as
follows.
(2) After section
1097A
insert—
‘1097B
Rectification of register: service
addresses
(1) The Secretary of
State may by regulations make provision authorising or requiring the
registrar to change a registered service address of a relevant person
if satisfied that the address does not meet the requirements of section
1141(1) and (2).
(2) In this
section—
“registered service address”, in relation to a relevant person, means the address for the time being shown in the register as the person’s current service address;
“relevant person” means—
(a) a director of a company that is not an overseas company,
(b) a secretary or one of the joint secretaries of a company that is not an overseas company, or
(c) a registrable person or registrable relevant legal entity in relation to a company (within the meanings given by section 790C).
(3) The regulations may
authorise or require the address to be changed on the
registrar’s own motion or on an application by another
person.
(4) The regulations
must provide for the change in the address to be effected by the
registrar proceeding as if the company had given notice under section
167H, 279H or 790LC of the
change.
(5) The regulations may
make provision as to—
(a) who may make an
application,
(b) the
information to be included in and documents to accompany an
application,
(c) the registrar
requiring the company or an applicant to provide information for the
purposes of determining anything under the
regulations,
(d) the notice to
be given of an application or that the registrar is considering the
exercise of powers under the
regulations,
(e) the notice to
be given of any decision under the
regulations,
(f) the period in
which objections to an application may be
made,
(g) how the registrar is
to determine whether a registered service address meets the
requirements of section 1141(1) and (2), including in particular the
evidence, or descriptions of evidence, which the registrar may without
further enquiry rely on to be satisfied that the address meets those
requirements,
(h) the referral
by the registrar of any question for determination by the
court,
(i) the registrar
requiring the company to provide an address to be registered as the
relevant person’s service
address,
(j) the nomination by
the registrar of an address (a “default address”) to be
registered as the relevant person’s service address (which need
not meet the requirements of section 1141(1) and
(2)),
(k) the period for which
the default address is permitted to be the relevant person’s
registered service address,
and
(l) when the change of
address takes effect and the consequences of registration of the change
(including provision similar or corresponding to section
1140(5)).
(6) The provision
made by virtue of subsection (5)(k) may in particular include provision
creating summary offences punishable with a fine not exceeding level 3
on the standard scale or, for continued contravention, a daily default
fine not exceeding one-tenth of level 3 on the standard
scale.
(7) The regulations must
confer a right on the company to appeal to the court against any
decision to change the relevant person’s registered service
address under the
regulations.
(8) If the
regulations enable a person to apply for a registered service address
to be changed, they must also confer a right on the applicant to appeal
to the court against a refusal of the
application.
(9) On an appeal,
the court must direct the registrar to register such address as the
relevant person’s registered service address as the court
considers appropriate in all the circumstances of the
case.
(10) The regulations may
make further provision about an appeal and in
particular—
(a)
provision about the time within which an appeal must be brought and the
grounds on which an appeal may be
brought;
(b) further provision
about directions by virtue of subsection
(9).
(11) The regulations may
include such provision applying (including applying with
modifications), amending or repealing an enactment contained in this
Act as the Secretary of State considers necessary or expedient in
consequence of any provision made by the
regulations.
(12) Regulations
under this section are subject to affirmative resolution
procedure.’
(3) In
section 1087 (material not available for public inspection), in
subsection
(1)(ga)—
‘(a)
after “1097A” insert “,
1097B”;
(b) for
“company registered office” substitute “registered
office, service address”.’”—
This new clause confers a regulation-making power to enable the registrar to change a person’s registered service address. It is based on section 1097A of the Companies Act 2006, which makes similar provision in relation to a company’s registered office.

Brought up, read the First and Second time, and added to the Bill.

New Clause 6 - Rectification of register: principal office addresses

“(1) The Companies
Act 2006 is amended as
follows.
(2) After section
1097B (inserted by section (Rectification of register: service
addresses) of this Act)
insert—
‘
(1) The Secretary
of State may by regulations make provision authorising or requiring the
registrar to change the address registered as the principal office of a
relevant person if satisfied that the address is not in fact their
principal office.
(2) In this
section—
“address registered as the principal office”, in relation to a relevant person, means the address for the time being shown in the register as the address of the person’s current principal office;
“relevant person” means—
(a) a director of a company that is not an overseas company,
(b) a secretary or one of the joint secretaries of a company that is not an overseas company,
(c) a registrable relevant legal entity in relation to a company (within the meaning given by section 790C), or
(d) a registrable person in relation to a company (within the meaning given by section 790C) who falls within section 790C(12).
(3) The regulations
may authorise or require the address to be changed on the
registrar’s own motion or on an application by another
person.
(4) The regulations
must provide for the change in the address to be effected by the
registrar proceeding as if the company had given notice under section
167H, 279H or 790LC of the
change.
(5) The regulations may
make provision as
to—
(a) who may make an
application,
(b) the
information to be included in and documents to accompany an
application,
(c) the registrar
requiring the company or an applicant to provide information for the
purposes of determining anything under the
regulations,
(d) the notice to
be given of an application or that the registrar is considering the
exercise of powers under the
regulations,
(e) the notice to
be given of any decision under the
regulations,
(f) the period in
which objections to an application may be
made,
(g) how the registrar is
to determine whether an address registered as the principal office of a
relevant person is in fact the person’s principal office,
including in particular the evidence, or descriptions of evidence,
which the registrar may without further enquiry rely on to be satisfied
that the address meets those
requirements,
(h) the referral
by the registrar of any question for determination by the
court,
(i) the registrar
requiring the company to provide an address to be registered as the
principal office of the relevant
person,
(j) the nomination by the registrar of an address (a
“default address”) to be registered
as the principal office of the relevant person (which need not be the
relevant person’s actual principal
office),
(k) the period for
which the default address is permitted to be the address registered as
the principal office of the relevant person,
and
(l) when the change of
address takes effect and the consequences of registration of the
change.
(6) The provision made
by virtue of subsection (5)(k) may in particular include provision
creating summary offences punishable with a fine not exceeding level 3
on the standard scale or, for continued contravention, a daily default
fine not exceeding one-tenth of level 3 on the standard
scale.
(7) The regulations must
confer a right on the company to appeal to the court against any
decision to change the address registered as the principal office of
the relevant person under the
regulations.
(8) If the
regulations enable a person to apply for the address registered as the
principal office of a relevant person to be changed, the regulations
must also confer a right on the applicant to appeal to the court
against a refusal of the
application.
(9) On an appeal,
the court must direct the registrar to register such address as the
principal office of the relevant person as the court considers
appropriate in all the circumstances of the
case.
(10) The regulations may
make further provision about an appeal and in
particular—
(a)
provision about the time within which an appeal must be brought and the
grounds on which an appeal may be
brought;
(b) further provision
about directions by virtue of subsection
(9).
(11) The regulations may
include such provision applying (including applying with
modifications), amending or repealing an enactment contained in this
Act as the Secretary of State considers necessary or expedient in
consequence of any provision made by the
regulations.
(12) Regulations
under this section are subject to affirmative resolution
procedure.’
(3) In
section 1087 (material not available for public inspection), in
subsection
(1)(ga)—
‘(a)
after “1097B” (inserted by section (Rectification of
register: service addresses) of this Act) insert “or
1097C”;
(b) after
“service address” (inserted by section (Rectification of
register: service addresses) of this Act) insert “or principal
office address”.’”—
This new clause confers a regulation-making power to enable the registrar to change the address of a person’s registered principal office. It is based on section 1097A of the Companies Act 2006, which makes similar provision in relation to a company’s registered office.

Brought up, read the First and Second time, and added to the Bill.

New Clause 7 - Power to require businesses to report discrepancies

‘(1) The
Companies Act 2006 is amended as
follows.
(2) In section 1059A
(scheme of Part 35), in subsection (4), at the appropriate place
insert—
“section 1110E (power to require businesses to report discrepancies),”.
(3)
After section 1110D (inserted by section 65 of this Act)
insert—


(1) The Secretary of State may by regulations impose
requirements on a person who is carrying on business in the United
Kingdom (a “relevant
person”)—
(a) to
obtain specified information about a customer (or prospective
customer)—
(i) before entering into a business relationship with them, or
(ii) during a business relationship with them;
(b) to
identify discrepancies between information so obtained and information
made publicly available by the registrar,
and
(c) to report any
discrepancies to the
registrar.
(2) The regulations
may require the relevant person, when reporting discrepancies, to
provide such other information as may be required by the regulations
(including information about the relevant
person).
(3) The regulations
may provide for reports or other information delivered to the registrar
under the regulations to be withheld from public
inspection.
(4) The regulations
may create offences in relation to failures to comply with requirements
imposed by the regulations.
(5)
The regulations may not provide for an offence created by the
regulations to be punishable with imprisonment for a period
exceeding—
(a) in the
case of conviction on indictment, 2
years;
(b) in the case of
summary conviction, 3
months.
(6) In this section
“customer”, in relation to a person carrying out estate
agency work, includes a purchaser (as well as a
seller).
(7) Regulations under
this section are subject to affirmative resolution
procedure.”’—
This new clause allows the Secretary of State to require businesses to obtain information and carry out checks for the purposes of identifying discrepancies between that information and information made publicly available by registrar.

Brought up, read the First and Second time, and added to the Bill.

New Clause 8 - Service of documents on people with significant control

‘In section 1140 of
the Companies Act 2006 (service of documents on directors, secretaries
and others), in subsection (2), after paragraph (a)
insert—
“(aa) a
person who is a registrable person or a registrable relevant legal
entity in relation to a company (within the meanings given by section
790C);”.’—
This new clause allows documents to be served on those with significant control over a company at the registered address that appears for the person on the register.

Brought up, read the First and Second time, and added to the Bill.

New Clause 9 - National security exemption from identity verification

‘After section
29 of the Limited Partnerships Act 1907 (inserted by section 129 of
this Act)
insert—


(1)
The Secretary of State may, by written notice given to a person,
provide for one or more of the effects listed in subsection
(2) to apply in relation to the person, if satisfied that to do so is
necessary—
(a) in the interests of national security,
or
(b) for the purposes of
preventing or detecting serious
crime.
(2) The effects for
which the notice may provide are
that—
(a) section
8A(1C)(b) and (1F)(c)(ii) do not apply in relation to a statement
naming the person as a proposed general partner’s proposed
registered officer;
(b) section
8L(3)(a)(ii) and (b)(ii) do not apply in relation to a notice naming
the person as a general partner’s new registered
officer;
(c) sections 8Q(4)(b)
and (7)(c)(ii) do not apply in relation to a notice naming the person
as a general partner’s proposed registered
officer;
(d) where the person
is a general partner’s registered officer, section 8K(1)(c) does
not impose any obligation on the general
partner;
(e) section 26
(documents to be delivered by authorised corporate service providers)
does not apply in relation to the delivery of documents to the
registrar by the person on their own behalf or on behalf of
another.
(3) For the purposes
of subsection
(1)(b)—
(a)
“crime” means conduct
which—
(i) constitutes a criminal offence, or
(ii) is, or corresponds to, any conduct which, if it all took place in any one part of the United Kingdom, would constitute a criminal offence, and
(b) crime is
“serious”
if—
(i) the offence which is or would be constituted by the conduct is an offence for which the maximum sentence (in any part of the United Kingdom) is imprisonment for 3 years or more, or

(ii) the conduct involves the use of violence, results in substantial financial gain or is conduct by a large number of persons in pursuit of a common purpose.”’—(Kevin Hollinrake.)
This new clause allows the Secretary of State to exempt a person from certain requirements that relate to identity verification if satisfied that doing so is necessary for national security related reasons.

Brought up, read the First and Second time, and added to the Bill.

New Clause 10 - Power to amend disqualification legislation in relation to relevant entities: GB

“After section 22H of the
Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986
insert—
‘
(1) The Secretary
of State may by regulations amend this Act for the purpose of applying,
or modifying the application of, any of its provisions in relation to
relevant entities.
(2) For that
purpose, the regulations may in
particular—
(a) extend
the company disqualification conditions to include corresponding
conditions relating to a relevant
entity;
(b) limit the company
disqualification conditions to remove conditions relating to a relevant
entity;
(c) modify which
company disqualification conditions can, in combination with each
other, result in a person being disqualified under this
Act;
(d) provide for any of the
company disqualification conditions to result in or contribute to a
person being disqualified from acting in a role or doing something in
relation to a relevant entity.
(3) In this section “the company
disqualification conditions” means the conditions that can
result in or contribute to a person being disqualified under this Act
from acting in a role or doing something in relation to any
entity.
(4) In this section a
“relevant entity”
means—
(a) a limited
partnership registered under the Limited Partnerships Act
1907;
(b) a limited liability
partnership registered under the Limited Liability Partnerships Act
2000;
(c) a partnership, other
than a limited partnership, that
is—
(i) constituted under the law of Scotland, and
(ii) a qualifying partnership within the meaning given by regulation 3 of the Partnerships (Accounts) Regulations 2008.
(5) Regulations under
this section may
make—
(a) consequential,
supplementary, incidental, transitional or saving
provision;
(b) different
provision for different
purposes.
(6) The provision
which may be made by virtue of subsection (5)(a) includes
provision amending provision made by or under either of the following,
whenever passed or
made—
(a) an
Act;
(b) Northern Ireland
legislation.
(7) Regulations
under this section are to be made by statutory
instrument.
(8) A statutory
instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made
unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a
resolution of each House of
Parliament.’”—
This new clause allows the Secretary of State to make regulations applying the CDDA in relation to relevant entities, meaning that a person’s conduct in relation to relevant entities would lead to disqualification, and disqualifications in other circumstances would prohibit a person from acting in relation to relevant entities.

Brought up, and read the First time.

Kevin Hollinrake: I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Julie Elliott: With this it will be convenient to discuss Government new clause 11—Power to amend disqualification in relation to relevant entities: NI.

Kevin Hollinrake: Through other provisions in this Bill, a disqualified individual is prevented from acting as a general partner of a limited partnership. However, that would only cover individuals who have been disqualified for their actions as directors in a company. We also need to be able to disqualify general partners for their actions within a limited partnership. Currently, that cannot be done because the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 applies only to directors of companies and other limited corporate entities such as building societies and NHS foundation trusts. We would like to ensure that general partners are subject to the same requirements as directors. New clauses 10 and 11 therefore provide powers to update the 1986 Act and the Company Directors Disqualification (Northern Ireland) Order 2002 to apply to limited partnerships, limited liability partnerships and Scottish partnerships.

Seema Malhotra: It is a pleasure to say a few words  in support of new clauses 10 and 11. New clause 10 introduces new provisions allowing the Secretary of State to make regulations applying the Company Directors  Disqualification Act to relevant entities. The new clause outlines that these relevant entities include limited partnerships and Scottish limited partnerships. New clause 11 has the same effect and applies the same principles to the context of Northern Ireland. We welcome the new clauses, especially given our calls in Committee to extend directors disqualification criteria to limited partnerships.

Kevin Hollinrake: I have nothing further to add.

Question put and agreed to.

New clause 10 accordingly read a Second time, and added to the Bill.

New Clause 11 - Power to amend disqualification legislation in relation to relevant entities: NI

“(1) The Company Directors
Disqualification (Northern Ireland) Order 2002 (S.I. 2002/3150 (N.I.
4)) is amended as follows.
(2)
In Article 2(2) (interpretation), for the definition of
‘regulations’
substitute—
‘“regulations”, except in Articles 13D and 25D, means regulations made by the Department subject (except in Article 23(3)) to negative resolution;’.
(3) After
Article 25C
insert—
‘25D
Power to amend application of Order in relation to relevant
entities
(1) The Secretary of
State may by regulations amend this Order for the purpose of applying,
or modifying the application of, any of its provisions in relation to
relevant entities.
(2) For that
purpose, the regulations may in
particular—
(a) extend
the company disqualification conditions to include corresponding
conditions relating to a relevant
entity;
(b) limit the company
disqualification conditions to remove conditions relating to a relevant
entity;
(c) modify which
company disqualification conditions can, in combination with each
other, result in a person being disqualified under this
Order;
(d) provide for any of
the company disqualification conditions to result in or contribute to a
person being disqualified from acting in a role or doing something in
relation to a relevant
entity.
(3) In this Article
“the company disqualification conditions” means the
conditions that can result in or contribute to a person being
disqualified under this Order from acting in a role or doing something
in relation to any entity.
(4)
In this Article a “relevant entity”
means—
(a) a limited
partnership registered under the Limited Partnerships Act
1907;
(b) a limited liability
partnership registered under the Limited Liability Partnerships Act
2000;
(c) a partnership, other
than a limited partnership, that
is—
(i) constituted under the law of Scotland, and
(ii) a qualifying partnership within the meaning given by regulation 3 of the Partnerships (Accounts) Regulations 2008.
(5) Regulations under
this Article may make consequential, supplementary, incidental,
transitional or saving
provision.
(6)
The provision which may be made by virtue of paragraph (5)
includes provision amending provision made by or under either of the
following, whenever passed or made—
(a) an
Act;
(b) Northern Ireland
legislation.
(7) Regulations
under this Article are to be made by statutory
instrument.
(8) A statutory
instrument containing regulations under this Article may not be made
unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a
resolution of each House of
Parliament.’”—
This new clause allows the Secretary of State to make regulations applying the CDD(NI)O 2002 in relation to relevant entities, meaning that a person’s conduct in relation to relevant entities would lead to disqualification, and disqualifications in other circumstances would prohibit a person from acting in relation to relevant entities.

Brought up, read the First and Second time, and added to the Bill.

New Clause 12 - Required information about overseas entities: address information

“In the following
provisions of Schedule 1 to the Economic Crime (Transparency and
Enforcement) Act 2022 (which refer to an entity’s registered or
principal office) omit ‘registered
or’—
paragraph 2(1)(c);
paragraph 5(1)(b);
paragraph 6(1)(d);

paragraph 7(1)(b).”—(Kevin Hollinrake.)
This new clause would mean that the required information that must be provided about an overseas entity, a corporate registrable beneficial owner or managing officer includes its principal office in all cases, rather than there being an option to provide its registered or principal office.

Brought up, and read the First time.

Kevin Hollinrake: I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Julie Elliott: With this it will be convenient to discuss the following:

Government new clause 13—Registration of information about land.

Government new clause 14—Registration of information about managing officers: age limits.

Government new clause 15—Registrable beneficial owners: cases involving trusts.

Government new clause 21—Enforcement of requirement to register: updated language about penalties etc.

Kevin Hollinrake: All the new clauses relate to the register of overseas entities. New clause 12 will mean that the required information that must be provided about an overseas entity, a corporate registrable beneficial owner or a managing officer will always include its principal office, rather than there merely being an option to provide its registered or principal office. The new clause will improve the quality of the information provided and align with the information required about other types of legal entities.
New clause 14 will ensure that overseas entities that provide the details of a managing officer who is under the age of 16, or who is a legal entity, must also provide details of a person who is more than 16 years old. This is to ensure that there is a person who can be contacted about the overseas entity, in addition to the relevant person who verified the information. It is possible that  in jurisdictions outside the UK, individuals younger than 16 may be allowed to act as company directors, secretaries or equivalents. Directors of UK companies are required to be at least 16 years of age, so the new clause provides consistency by requiring the contact details of someone who is at least 16 years of age.
New clause 21 will update the language about penalties for non-compliance in section 34 of the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022 to reflect changes made by the Judicial Review and Courts Act 2022. It will ensure consistency with the wording used in other clauses in the Bill.
New clause 13 will require overseas entities to include the title number for relevant interests in land that they hold in their application for registration, both when providing an update and when applying to be removed from the register. Overseas entities that are already registered will be required to provide this information when they next provide an update or, if sooner, when they apply to be removed from the register. The collection of this information will improve the effectiveness of the register and will help law enforcement agencies with their investigations. The information will not be made publicly available because the Government do not consider that to be appropriate, given privacy concerns.
Let me turn new clause 15. In advance of the launch of the register, the Register of Overseas Entities (Delivery, Protection and Trust Services) Regulations 2022 were made. Regulation 14 specified the circumstances in which a legal entity trustee is deemed to be
“subject to its own disclosure requirements”.
By virtue of a legal entity trustee being a registrable beneficial owner, the overseas entity must provide the required information about the trust and persons connected to it, such as beneficiaries, settlors and interested persons.

Margaret Hodge: This is an issue for clarification, because it impacts on whether we move our new clause 59. Will the information that we are now going to get about trustees and beneficiaries be made public? Will it be open to the public in the same way as other information about beneficial owners is open to the public? I ask because that is what our new clause would achieve.

Kevin Hollinrake: I will deal with that, if I can, as I go through. Essentially, trusts are often there to protect the identity of vulnerable persons, so I am not sure that the provision will do what the right hon. Member wants to do in her new clause, but we can probably discuss that when we discuss her new clause.

Margaret Hodge: So it does not do it.

Kevin Hollinrake: Without regulation 14, if the corporate trustee were not subject to its own disclosure requirements, the overseas entity would have to “look through” the legal entity trustee to find a registrable beneficial owner higher up the chain of ownership. But in the situations we are talking about it is information about the trust that is wanted, rather than information about the ownership or control of the legal entity trustee. Currently, regulation 14 therefore ensures that Companies House, His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and law enforcement agencies receive the information about the trust and persons  connected to it, which I think may be the point that the right hon. Member raises and which is much more useful to meet the aims of the register.
New clause 15 goes further by ensuring that a legal entity acting as a trustee is always a registrable beneficial owner whether or not it is “subject to its own disclosure requirements” and even if there is another registrable beneficial owner further down a chain of ownership. This maximises the transparency in respect of the involvement of a legal entity trust in a chain of ownership.
The provisions also provide a power to expand the description of persons who are registrable beneficial owners where the overseas entity is part of a chain of entities that includes a trustee. It is appropriate to have a power to expand the description, given that there may be complex arrangements that attempt to circumvent the requirements. The provisions revoke regulation 14 because it is no longer needed.

Seema Malhotra: It is a pleasure to make a few remarks on the new clauses which, certainly from the way the Minister has outlined them, are welcome, in that they require more information and transparency around overseas entities. We welcome all the new clauses in that regard. I do not propose to go through them—the Minister went through them in considerable detail—but I have a few comments.
On new clause 13—in fact, in relation to all the new clauses—we welcome the additional transparency. I make the point again that a particular reason for that is the large-scale abuse that we know has occurred and occurs through these rather opaque offshore corporate structures.
On new clause 14, it is welcome to have the threshold at 16 years old, but I want to clarify what that means. Can there technically be a managing officer who is under 16 but an individual who is over 16 and is a contact on their behalf? It would be helpful to know whether there could still technically be an officer who was 12, 13 or 14. It would be useful to have clarity on that.
On closing the potential loophole of beneficial owners avoiding scrutiny by acting as a trustee, it is important to have the information. I want to clarify whether it should be the same amount of information about those who have been avoiding scrutiny as trustees. Will that information be published so that third parties can search it and investigate for themselves?

Kevin Hollinrake: As I understand it, somebody under the age of 16 could be the managing officer, but we still require somebody over the age of 16 to be contactable. That is how we square that particular circle. It is not in our gift to legislate for how other jurisdictions describe directors of companies.
Forgive me, but I missed the hon. Lady’s second point. If she could restate it, I will try to address it.

Seema Malhotra: My second comment was about trustee information. New clause 15 expands the definition of “registrable beneficial owners” in part 1 of the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022 in relation to an entity one of whose beneficial owners is a  trustee, such that the beneficial owner may be included. There is also a power to expand that definition further. It looks like it is closing a potential loophole that enables beneficial owners to avoid scrutiny through acting as a trustee. The question was about whether the new information about trustees will also be published, whether there will be full transparency and whether it will be searchable by any interested parties.

Kevin Hollinrake: Okay. That was a similar point to the one made by the right hon. Member for Barking. No, we do not feel that is right. We do not believe that trust information should be made publicly available, given that trusts are often used to protect vulnerable people. I reassure the hon. Lady that that information will be shareable with HMRC, law enforcement and other persons with functions of a public nature once the relevant regulations have been made.

Question put and agreed to.

New clause 12 accordingly read a Second time, and added to the Bill.

New Clause 13 - Registration of information about land

“In
Schedule 1 to the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act
2022 (required information), in paragraph
2—
(a) in sub-paragraph
(1), after paragraph (g)
insert—
‘(h) if
the entity is the registered proprietor of one or more qualifying
estates in land in England and Wales, the title number of each of
them;
(b) if the entity is the
registered owner of one or more qualifying estates in Northern Ireland,
the folio number in respect of each of
them;
(c) if the entity
is—
(i) entered as proprietor in the proprietorship section of the title sheet for one or more plots of land that are registered in the Land Register of Scotland, or
(ii) the tenant under one or more leases registered in the Land Register of Scotland,
the title number of
the title sheet, in respect of each of them, in which the
entity’s interest is
registered.’;
(b) after
sub-paragraph (2)
insert—
‘(3) In
sub-paragraph
(1)(h)—
“registered proprietor”, in relation to a qualifying estate, means the person entered as proprietor of the estate in the register of title kept by the Chief Land Registrar;
“qualifying estate” has the meaning given by paragraph 1 of Schedule 4A to the Land Registration Act 2002.
(4) In sub-paragraph
(1)(i)—
“registered owner”, in relation to a qualifying estate, means the person registered in the register kept under the Land Registration Act (Northern Ireland) 1970 (c. 18 (N.I.)) as the owner of the estate;
“qualifying estate” has the meaning given by paragraph 1 of Schedule 8A to the Land Registration Act (Northern Ireland) 1970.
(5) In sub-paragraph
(1)(j)—
(a)
“lease”, “plot of land” and
“proprietor” have the meanings given by section 113(1) of
the Land Registration etc. (Scotland) Act 2012;
(b) the reference to an entity’s being
entered as proprietor in the proprietorship section of a title sheet is
a reference to the name of the entity being so
entered.’”—
This new clause requires an overseas entity, when applying for registration in the register of overseas entities or providing an update, to include the title number etc for relevant interests in land held by it. For entities already registered, it will operate when they next provide an update.

Brought up, read the First and Second time, and added to the Bill.

New Clause 14 - Registration of information about managing officers: age limits

“(1) Schedule 1 to the
Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022 (applications:
required information) is amended as
follows.
(2) In paragraph 6(1),
after paragraph (f)
insert—
‘(g) if
the officer is under the age of 16 years old, the name and contact
details of an individual who is at least 16 years old and is
willing to be contacted about the
officer.’
(3) In
paragraph 7(1), for paragraph (g)
substitute—
‘(g)
the name and contact details of an individual who is at least 16 years
old and is willing to be contacted about the
officer.’”—
This new clause means that, where an application for registration as an overseas entity is required to provide details of a managing officer, there will be a requirement to include the name of an individual who is at least 16 years old and is willing to be contacted about the officer (unless the officer is an individual of at least that age).

Brought up, read the First and Second time, and added to the Bill.

New Clause 15 - Registrable beneficial owners: cases involving trusts

“(1) Schedule 2 to the
Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022 (registrable
beneficial owners) is amended in accordance with subsections (2)
to(5).
(2) In paragraph
3 (legal entities), in paragraph (b), after ‘(see Part
3)’ insert ‘or is a beneficial owner of the overseas
entity by virtue of being a
trustee’.
(3) In
paragraph 8 (beneficial owners exempt from registration), after
paragraph (b)
insert—
‘(ba) the
person is not a beneficial owner of the overseas entity by virtue of
being a trustee,’.
(4)
For the heading of Part 6 substitute ‘Powers to amend this
Schedule’.
(5) Before
paragraph 25
insert—
‘Expansion of meaning of “registrable beneficial owner” where trusts in view
24A (1) The
Secretary of State may by regulations amend this Schedule so as to
expand the description of persons who are registrable beneficial owners
of an overseas entity in circumstances where the overseas entity is
part of a chain of entities that includes a
trustee.
(2) For these purposes
an overseas entity is part of a chain of entities that includes a
trustee if there is a legal entity which is a beneficial owner of it by
virtue of being a trustee.
(3)
Regulations under this paragraph are subject to the affirmative
resolution procedure.
Power to amend thresholds etc’.
(6)
Regulation 14 of the Register of Overseas Entities (Delivery,
Protection and Trust Services) Regulations 2022 (S.I.
2022/870) (description of legal entity subject to its own disclosure
requirements) is revoked.”—
This new clause expands the definition of “registrable beneficial owner” in Part 1 of the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022 in relation to an entity one of whose beneficial owners is a trustee. There is also a power to further expand the definition.

Brought up, read the First and Second time, and added to the Bill.

New Clause 16 - Material unavailable for public inspection: verification information

“In section 16 of
the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022
(verification of registrable beneficial owners and managing officers),
in subsection (2), after paragraph (c)
insert—
‘(d)
requiring the registrar not to make available for public inspection
certain information delivered to the registrar by virtue of the
regulations.’”—
Section 16 of the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022 confers power to make regulations about identity verification. This new clause allows the regulations to provide that information provided under the regulations is protected from public inspection.

Brought up, read the First and Second time, and added to the Bill.

New Clause 17 - Material unavailable for public inspection

“For sections 22
to 24 of the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022
substitute—
‘
(1) The
following material must not, so far as it forms part of the register,
be made available by the registrar for public
inspection—
(a) so much
of any application or other document delivered to the registrar under
section 4, 7 or 9 as is required to
contain—
(i) protected date of birth information;
(ii) protected residential address information;
(iii) protected trusts information;
(iv) the name or contact details of an individual provided for the purposes of section 4(1)(d), 7(1)(e) or 9(1)(f) or paragraph 6(1)(g) or 7(1)(g) of Schedule 1;
(v) an overseas entity’s email address (see paragraph 2(1)(e) of Schedule1);
(vi) any title numbers or folio numbers in respect of land (see paragraph 2(1)(h), (i) and (j) of Schedule1);
(b)
any information that regulations under section 16 provide is not to be
made available for public
inspection;
(c) the
following—
(i) any application or other document delivered to the registrar under regulations under section 25 (regulations protecting material), other than information provided by virtue of section 25(4);
(ii) any information which regulations under section 25 require not to be made available for public inspection;
(d) any
application or other document delivered to the registrar under section
28 (administrative removal of material from the
register);
(e) any court order
under section 30 (rectification of the register under court order) that
the court has directed under section 31 is not to be made available for
public inspection;
(f) any statement delivered to
the registrar by virtue of section 1067A(3) or (4) of the Companies Act
2006 (delivery of documents: identity verification requirements
etc);
(g) any statement made in
accordance with regulations made by virtue of section 1082(2)(c) of the
Companies Act 2006 (statement of unique
identifier);
(h) any document
provided to the registrar under section 1092A of the Companies Act 2006
(power to require further
information);
(i)
any email address, identification code or password
deriving from a document delivered for the purpose of authorising or
facilitating electronic filing procedures or providing information by
telephone;
(j) any record of
the information contained in a document (or part of a document)
mentioned in any of the previous paragraphs of this
subsection;
(k) any other
material excluded from public inspection by or under any other
enactment.
(2) In this
section—
“protected date of birth information” means information as to the day of the month (but not the month or year) on which an individual who is a registrable beneficial owner or managing officer of an overseas entity was born;
“protected residential address information” means information as to the usual residential address of an individual who is a registrable beneficial owner or managing officer of an overseas entity;
“protected trusts information” means the required information about a trust (see sections 4(3), 7(3) and (4) and 9(3) and (4).
(3) Information about a
registrable beneficial owner or managing officer does not cease to be
protected date of birth information or protected residential address
information when they cease to be a registrable beneficial owner or
managing officer.
(4) Where
subsection (1), or a provision referred to in subsection (1), imposes a
restriction by reference to material deriving from a particular
description of document (or part of a document), that does not affect
the availability for public inspection of the same information
contained in material derived from another description of document (or
part of a document) in relation to which no such restriction
applies.
(5) The registrar need
not retain material to which subsection (1) applies for
longer than appears to the registrar reasonably necessary for the
purposes for which the material was delivered to the
registrar.

(1)
The registrar must not disclose protected date of birth information,
protected residential address information or protected trusts
information unless—
(a)
the disclosure is permitted by section 1110F of the Companies Act 2006
(general powers of disclosure by the registrar),
or
(b) the information is
required to be made available for public inspection (as a result of
being contained in a document, part of a document, or record to which
section 22(1) does not
apply).
(2) In this section the
following have the meaning given by section
22(2)—
“protected date of birth information”;
“protected residential address information”;

“protected trusts information”.’”—(Kevin Hollinrake.)
This new clause replicates for the register of overseas entities a number of changes made by the Bill in relation to companies. It also extends the list of information unavailable for public inspection.

Brought up, read the First and Second time, and added to the Bill.

New Clause 18 - Protection of information

“For section
25 of the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022
substitute—

(1) The Secretary
of State may by regulations make provision requiring the registrar, on
application—
(a) not to
make available for public inspection any information on the register
relating to an individual;
(b)
to refrain from disclosing information on the register relating to an
individual except in specified
circumstances;
(c) not to make
available for public inspection any address on the register that is not
information to which paragraph (a)
applies;
(d) to refrain from
disclosing any such address except in specified
circumstances.
(2) The
regulations may make provision as
to—
(a) who may make an
application;
(b) the grounds on
which an application may be
made;
(c) the information to be
included in and documents to accompany an
application;
(d) the notice to
be given of an application and of its
outcome;
(e) how an application
is to be determined;
(f) the
duration of, and procedures for revoking, any restrictions on the
making of information available for public inspection or its
disclosure.
(3) Provision under
subsection (2)(e) or (2)(f) may in
particular—
(a) confer a
discretion on the
registrar;
(b) provide for a
question to be referred to a person other than the registrar for the
purposes of determining the application or revoking the
restrictions.
(4) Regulations
under subsection (1)(a) or (1)(c) may provide that information is not
to be made unavailable for public inspection unless the person to whom
it relates provides such alternative information as may be
specified.
(5)
The circumstances that may be specified under subsection
(1)(b) or (d) by way of an exception to a restriction on disclosure
include circumstances where the court has made an order, in accordance
with the regulations, authorising
disclosure.
(6) Regulations
under subsection (1)(b) or (d) may not require the registrar
to refrain from disclosing information under section 1110F
of the Companies Act 2006 (general powers of disclosure by the
registrar).
(7) Regulations
under this section may impose a duty on the registrar to publish, in
relation to such periods as may be
specified—
(a) details
of how many applications have been made under the regulations and how
many of them have been allowed,
and
(b) such other details in
connection with applications under the regulations as may be specified
in the regulations.
(8)
Regulations under this section are subject to affirmative resolution
procedure.’”—
This new clause replicates for the register of overseas entities the provision made by clause 87 of the Bill in relation to companies.

Brought up, read the First and Second time, and added to the Bill.

New Clause 19 - Resolving inconsistencies in the register

“(1) Section 27 of
the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022 (resolving
inconsistencies in the register) is amended as
follows.
(2) For subsections
(1) and (2)
substitute—
‘(1)
Where it appears to the registrar that the information contained in a
document delivered to the registrar by an overseas entity in connection
with the register is inconsistent with other information contained in
records kept by the registrar under section 1080 of the Companies Act
2006, the registrar may give notice to the overseas entity to which the
document relates—
(a)
stating in what respects the information contained in it appears to be
inconsistent with other information in records kept by the registrar
under section 1080 of the Companies Act 2006,
and
(b) requiring the overseas
entity, within the period of 14 days beginning with the date on which
the notice is issued, to take all such steps as are reasonably open to
it to resolve the inconsistency by delivering replacement or additional
documents or in any other
way.
(2) The notice must state
the date on which it is
issued.’
(3)
In the heading, omit ‘in the
register’.”—
This new clause makes changes for the purpose of resolving inconsistencies in information relating to overseas entities that corresponds to the changes made by clause 81 of the Bill in relation to companies.

Brought up, read the First and Second time, and added to the Bill.

New Clause 20 - Administrative removal of material from register

“(1) In the Economic
Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act
2022—
(a) for section 28
substitute—

(1) The registrar
may remove from the register anything that appears to the registrar to
be—
(a) a document, or
material derived from a document, accepted under section 1073 of the
Companies Act 2006 (power to accept documents not meeting requirements
for proper delivery), or
(b)
unnecessary material as defined by section 1074 of the Companies Act
2006.
(2) The power to remove
material from the register under this section may be
exercised—
(a) on the
registrar’s own motion,
or
(b) on an application made
in accordance with regulations under section
28A(2).
(3) The Secretary of
State may by regulations provide that the registrar’s power to
remove material from the register under this section following an
application is limited to material of a description specified in the
regulations.
(4) Regulations
under this section are subject to the negative resolution
procedure.

(1) The Secretary
of State must by regulations make provision for notice to be given in
accordance with the regulations where material is removed from the
register under section 28 otherwise than on an
application.
(2) The Secretary
of State must by regulations make provision in connection with the
making and determination of applications for the removal of material
from the register under section 28.
(3) The provision that may be made under subsection
(2) includes provision as
to—
(a) who may make an
application,
(b) the
information to be included in and documents to accompany an
application,
(c) the notice to
be given of an application and of its
outcome,
(d) a period in which
objections to an application may be made,
and
(e) how an application is
to be determined, including provision as to evidence that may be relied
upon by the registrar for the purposes of satisfying the test in
section 28(1).
(4) The
provision that may be made by virtue of subsection (3)(e)
includes provision as to circumstances in
which—
(a) evidence is
to be treated by the registrar as conclusive proof that the test in
section 28(1) is met, and
(b)
the power of removal must be
exercised.
(5) Regulations
under this section are subject to the negative resolution
procedure.’;
(b) omit
sections 29 and 29A (application to rectify register and resolution of
discrepancies).
(2) In section
1073 of the Companies Act 2006 (power to accept documents not meeting
requirements for proper delivery), in subsection (6)(a), after
‘section 1094A(1)’ (inserted by section 82 of
this Act)
insert—
‘or any corresponding provision of any other enactment’.”—(Kevin Hollinrake.)
This new clause replicates for the register of overseas entities the changes that clause 82 of the Bill makes in relation to the register of companies.

Brought up, read the First and Second time, and added to the Bill.

New Clause 21 - Enforcement of requirement to register: updated language about penalties etc

“(1) The Economic Crime
(Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022 is amended as
follows.
(2) In section 34
(power to require overseas entity to register if it owns certain
land)—
(a) in subsection
(4)(a), for ‘the maximum summary term for either-way
offences’ substitute ‘a term not exceeding the general
limit in a magistrates’
court’;
(b) omit
subsection (5).
(3) In section
36 (meaning of ‘daily default fine’) after
‘applies for’ insert
‘the’.”—
This new clause updates the penalty provision for the offence in section 34 of the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022 to reflect changes made by the Judicial Review and Courts Act 2022. This ensures consistency with the language that clauses 136 and 137 introduce into the 2022 Act.

Brought up, read the First and Second time, and added to the Bill.

Ordered, That further consideration be now adjourned. —(Scott Mann.)

Adjourned till Thursday 24 November at half-past Eleven o’clock.

Written evidence reported to the House

ECCTB 21 Mark Hardy
ECCTB 22 Elspeth Berry, Associate Professor of Law, Nottingham Law School (further/second supplementary submission)
ECCTB 23 Mastercard
ECCTB 24 Legal Services Board
ECCTB 25 Professor John Heathershaw, University of Exeter, & Thomas Mayne, University of Oxford (supplementary submission)
ECCTB 26 Letter from Kevin Hollinrake MP, Minister for Enterprise, Markets and Small Business, at the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, dated 21 November 2022, re: Clarifications from Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill Public Bill Committee, Day 5, Thursday 17 November
ECCTB 27 Peters and Peters Solicitors LLP